|
Ten Forces Transforming Corporate Banking Connectivity
GXS Market Perspective
The past five years have witnessed the emergence of a
number of new operational models, regulatory changes
and technology paradigms in the corporate treasury
and banking sector. The result is radical changes to the structure of treasury functions within multi-national corporations.
The changes are also impacting the relationships
between corporations and banks—both the way
in which banking products are selected and the service
level expectations treasury organisations hold for financial
institutions are evolving. There is also a significant
paradigm shift in the technical approaches used to
exchange information between corporations and their
cash management banks.
GXS has compiled a list of the ten primary forces transforming
the way in which corporations and banks communicate
electronically. The list is based upon studies
of market-leading multi-national corporations based in
Western Europe and the United States. The ten forces
are not mutually exclusive, but rather interdependent.
Five of the forces outlined are changes that affect overall
corporate banking practices—new organisational
structures, payment strategies and management models.
The remaining five are technology developments
that are impacting the electronic communications
between banks and corporate clients.
Transforming Corporate Banking
Practices (#1-5)
- Single European Payments Area (SEPA)—Starting in
the 1990s, the European Union began the SEPA initiative
to harmonise and simplify payments across the 15 countries
which have embraced the Euro as the national currency.
The goal of SEPA is to establish a common set of
regulations, processes, standards and technologies for making
payments across the Eurozone. Consumers and corporations
will enjoy consistent pricing and service levels
regardless of their country of citizenship and the location of
their bank account. As a result, citizens and corporations will
be able to make payments in any Eurozone country as easily
and cost-effectively as they could in their home nation.With
a harmonised approach to payments across Europe, corporations
will begin to shift their country-specific finance,
accounting and treasury functions to broader Pan-European
models. Additionally, selection criteria for banking partners
and products will evolve as financial institutions expand their
geographic footprint and introduce new, low-cost cross-border
payment services.
- Payment Factories—Historically, corporations have maintained
separate Accounts Payable (A/P) organisations in each
country to provide the necessary local tax and payment
expertise. However, there is a growing trend towards centralising
A/P functions into shared service centres, otherwise
known as “payment factories.”The shared service centres
enable opportunities for higher levels of efficiency in the
back-office. Productivity improvements can be gained by
eliminating country-level staffing and by embracing best
practices on a regional level. Further savings can be gained
by relocating A/P functions to either captive or outsourced
service centres in lower cost geographies.Transitions to
centralised, payment factories require staffing and procedural
changes, and standardisation of A/P applications.Many
multi national corporations are re-evaluating their approach
to payment processing as they transition to shared service
centres.
- Centralised Treasury—In addition to creating shared service
centres for A/P, corporations are re evaluating organisational
models for the treasury function.Many multi-national enterprises
are centralising treasury groups on a regional or global
basis. Historically, corporations allowed each country to
manage its cash needs locally. Centralisation enables a number
of efficiencies in the areas of cash forecasting, foreign
exchange and cross-border payments. However, to realise the benefits, corporate treasury organisations need
access to real-time information on account balances,
investment holdings and securities prices from their
financial institution. Consequently, the transition to
centralised treasury models is driving higher demand
for straight-through processing of information between
corporations and financial institutions.
- In-House Banking—Many large corporations are establishing
in-house banks to complement centralised treasury
functions. These banks are not officially regulated
or licensed financial institutions. However, they act
much like a commercial bank by offering payment processing,
liquidity management and collections functions
to various subsidiaries of a large, global corporation.
The creation of an in-house bank substantially impacts
the corporate banking interface. Instead of each operating
company routing payment transactions directly to a
local bank, all disbursements are channeled through the
in-house bank at headquarters. Centralised payment
processing applications managed by the treasury group
are configured to evaluate opportunities to reduce
banking fees. Multi-lateral netting, supplier payment consolidation and local funding techniques are examples
of services provided by an in-house bank.
- Consolidation of Banking Relationships—Along with
centralisation of internal functions, multi-national corporations
are also rationalising the number of banking
relationships they maintain. Changing regulations in
the US, the European Union and countries such as
China have enabled numerous financial institutions to
develop a global footprint. Consequently, multi-national
corporations no longer need to establish local banking
relationships in each country of operation. Instead, corporations
can consolidate banking providers to the
minimal number appropriate to cover the necessary
geographic footprint and offer the appropriate product
features. As part of the consolidation process, corporations
are demanding that financial institutions provide
lower processing fees, higher service level agreements
and stronger technical integration. Corporations are
mandating a minimal set of technology requirements
which financial institutions must comply with in order
to compete for global banking contracts.

Transforming Corporate Banking Connectivity (#6-10)
- ERP Consolidation—Most multi-national corporations
have a project underway to standardise and consolidate
the various ERP applications being utilised within their
enterprise. Historically, different brands, operating companies
and legal entities have operated autonomously
with their own enterprise systems. Fragmentation of
ERP platforms prohibits sharing of information across
divisions and with headquarters. Standardisation of
ERP onto a common platform (e.g., Oracle 11i) enables
consistent business practices across divisions and the
utilisation of shared service centres for back-office functions.
As multi-national corporations consolidate and
standardise their finance, accounting and treasury modules,
IT organisations are re-evaluating their approach
to bank connectivity.
- SWIFT Connectivity—Several hundred large corporations
have registered to participate in SWIFT’s corporate
access programs. SWIFT connectivity can reduce
the costs and complexity associated with corporate
banking communications. Corporations utilise a number
of different transmission mechanisms to exchange
data with their banks. High volume data transfers typically
occur over private lines or Internet-based file
transfer. In some cases, older technologies such as dialup
connections and fax transmissions are still in use
by smaller corporations.Web portals have become an
increasingly popular option for bank interfaces recently.
With SWIFT access, corporations can replace the broad
mix of connectivity mechanisms with a single standardised
approach.Messages and files can be sent to
SWIFT for routing to any of the over 7,000 banks
on SWIFTNet reducing cost and complexity.
- ISO 20022 XML—Otherwise known as the Universal
Financial Industry (UNIFI) standard, ISO 20022 XML
is designed to replace the myriad of local file formats
used for payment processing around the world with a
single, global message schema.Today, most corporations
utilise EDI (e.g., EDIFACT, ANSI X12), country-specific
ACH formats (e.g., NACHA in the US) or legacy banking standards (e.g., BAI, SWIFT FIN) to exchange
information with financial institutions. The file formats
used to send payment instructions and receive account
statements vary from bank to bank. In some cases, corporations
are required to send more than one type of
file format to different divisions of the same bank. The
UNIFI vision is for corporations to be able to utilise
one message schema to exchange information with any
bank in the world.
- Multi-Bank Cash Reporting—One of the key benefits
achieved from centralising treasury functions is the
improved cash management capabilities.Treasury personnel
with visibility to all cash positions at bank accounts worldwide are better equipped to perform
cash forecasting, borrowing and investment activities.
Treasurers must be able to easily collect account balance
information from all bank accounts in all countries.
Multi-bank reporting applications developed by
financial institutions and technology providers offer
account aggregation services.The services consolidate
end-of-day and intra-day balances for all accounts onto
a single web portal or channel the information directly
into a treasury workstation. Corporations armed with
enhanced cash visibility can make borrowing or investing
decisions earlier in the day, reduce probability of
overnight idle balances and accelerate the processing
of exception items.
- Bank Relationship Management Software—Bank connectivity has become such a complex issue
for corporations that several ERP vendors have introduced
specialised software modules to simplify integration.
SAP recently introduced its “Bank Relationship
Management” application.The SAP module offers
native support for ISO 20022 XML and SWIFT
corporate access. Furthermore, the SAP application
has seamless integration with the vendor’s treasury and
accounting modules thereby lowering the barriers to
straight-through processing with financial institutions.
Out-of-the-box support for emerging standards from
major ERP vendors will accelerate adoption by multinational
corporations.
Additional Forces
The ten factors listed above are revolutionising the way
corporations interface with their cash management banks.
The list could be further extended to include technological
forces such as Large File Transfer, conversion from cheques to
Electronics Funds Transfer (EFT), and banking innovations
such as Payments Hubs.
- Conversion from Cheques to EFT—Corporations are
rapidly migrating away from cheques and paper instruments
to Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT).The most
significant transition is occurring in the US, which historically
utilised cheques as the primary B2B and B2C
payment instrument. Credit cards, debit cards, online
bill pay and lockbox-based image conversion are rapidly
driving B2C payments to EFT. Adoption of EFT in the
B2B payments segment has been slower. However, procurement
cards and Automated Clearing House (ACH)
are quickly becoming the primary payment instruments
for large corporations. The result is that corporations
must communicate a significantly higher volume of
electronic payment instructions to financial institutions than with cheques. For large multinationals, the net
increase in number of payment messages sent to banks
could be in the millions per year.
- Large File Transfer—Corporate treasury groups are
seeking more information in faster time frames than
ever before. For example, in the US the rapid growth of
image-based cheque substitution is driving demand for
copies of cheque images to be distributed to corporations.
Collections organisations retain the cheque
images for customer service, record-keeping and
exception processing purposes.Today, cheque images
are burned onto a CD-ROM and shipped via courierto a corporation.The CD-based distribution is becoming
too cumbersome and complex for most corporations
to manage. Consequently, financial institutions are
migrating towards Internet-based file transfer of cheque
images. However, many banks and corporations lack the technology infrastructure to support such high volumes
of data exchange. New low-cost, high-volume services
for Large File Transfer are emerging, promising to further
simplify corporate banking communications.
Executive Dialogue Blogs
Sourcing from China
Volumes of cross-border trade between exporters in China and importers in the US and Europe have been growing consistently over the past 20 years. But a series of potential supply chain disruptions are forcing procurement organisations to rethink their sourcing strategies. Should you diversify your supplier base to other low cost geographies? Read more on the challenges faced exporting goods from China in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|